Glavan Madalin Laurentiu Will Analyze Adversarial VS. Inquisitorial Law

Glavan Madalin Laurentiu, who is enrolled in the study of law at private university Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University in Bucharest, Romania, will likely encounter the oppositions of an inquisitorial system of justice versus an adversarial system of justice, dealing with the questions of truth versus society’s feelings about its legal system.  The United States justice system is an adversarial one, wherein in verdicts are considered more inaccurate, but the overall perception of citizens is a greater degree of fairness.  In the United States both prosecution and defense is more likely to feel they had a chance to present their case.  The British system is regarded as an inquisitorial system of justice, which is perceived as being a more accurate system for verdicts, but yields less satisfaction in the process for the individual’s presentation of their point of view.

Viewed in this way, the dilemma which Glavan Madalin Laurentiu is likely to encounter in his legal studies is a question of what is more important: the truth, or how people feel about the legal process?

Mundane realism is the degree to which a controlled experiment situation can be favorably compared to the real world situations presented in a court of law.  The impact of social scientists such as psychologists, psychiatrists, psychosocial experts and others have become factors in the prosecution of the law, and the questionable interpretations of the meanings of their testimonies in relation to crimes and criminals offer ongoing challenges to all aspects of the legal system, especially lawyers, judges and juries.

http://homepages.rpi.edu/~verwyc/lawchap1.htm